Abstract
Following curative treatment for colorectal cancer (CRC), 30% to 50% of patients will develop recurrent disease. For CRC there are several lines of evidence supporting the hypothesis that early detection of meta chronous disease offers a second opportunity for cure. This paper revisits the potential role of serum carcinoem bryonic antigen (CEA) in follow-up. A comprehensive review of the literature (1978-2008) demonstrates that the initial promise of serum CEA as an effective surveillance tool has been tarnished through perpetuation of poorly designed studies. Specific limitations included: testing CEA as only an 'add-on' diagnostic tool; lack of standardization of threshold values; use of static thresholds; too low measurement frequency. Major changes in localizing imaging techniques and treatment of metastatic CRC further cause a decrease of clinical applicability of past trial outcomes. In 1982, Staab hypothesized that the optimal benefit of serum CEA as a surveillance tool is through high-frequency triage using a dynamic threshold (HiDT). Evidence supporting this hypothesis was found in the biochemical characteristics of serum CEA and retrospective studies showing the superior predictive value of a dynamic threshold. A multi-centred randomized phase III study optimizing the usage of HiDT against resectability of recurrent disease is commencing recruitment in the Netherlands. © 2011 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 2302-2315 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | Cancers |
Volume | 3 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jun 2011 |
Keywords
- Carcinoembryonic antigen
- Colorectal cancer
- Follow-up
- Metastases
- Recurrent disease