TY - JOUR
T1 - The role of stimulus complexity, spectral overlap, and pitch for gap-detection thresholds in young and old listeners
AU - Heinrich, Antje
AU - de la Rosa, S
AU - Schneider, B.
PY - 2014/10/31
Y1 - 2014/10/31
N2 - Thresholds for detecting a gap between two complex tones were determined for young listeners with normal hearing and old listeners with mild age-related hearing loss. The leading tonal marker was always a 20-ms, 250-Hz complex tone with energy at 250, 500, 750, and 1000 Hz. The lagging marker, also tonal, could differ from the leading marker with respect to fundamental frequency (f0), the presence versus absence of energy at f0, and the degree to which it overlapped spectrally with the leading marker. All stimuli were presented with steeper (1 ms) and less steep (4 ms) envelope rise and fall times. F0 differences, decreases in the degree of spectral overlap between the markers, and shallower envelope shape all contributed to increases in gap-detection thresholds. Age differences for gap detection of complex sounds were generally small and constant when gap-detection thresholds were measured on a log scale. When comparing the results for complex sounds to thresholds obtained for pure-tones in a previous study by Heinrich and Schneider [(2006). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 119, 2316-2326], thresholds increased in an orderly fashion from markers with identical (within-channel) pure tones to different (between-channel) pure tones to complex sounds. This pattern of results was true for listeners of both ages although younger listeners had smaller thresholds overall.
AB - Thresholds for detecting a gap between two complex tones were determined for young listeners with normal hearing and old listeners with mild age-related hearing loss. The leading tonal marker was always a 20-ms, 250-Hz complex tone with energy at 250, 500, 750, and 1000 Hz. The lagging marker, also tonal, could differ from the leading marker with respect to fundamental frequency (f0), the presence versus absence of energy at f0, and the degree to which it overlapped spectrally with the leading marker. All stimuli were presented with steeper (1 ms) and less steep (4 ms) envelope rise and fall times. F0 differences, decreases in the degree of spectral overlap between the markers, and shallower envelope shape all contributed to increases in gap-detection thresholds. Age differences for gap detection of complex sounds were generally small and constant when gap-detection thresholds were measured on a log scale. When comparing the results for complex sounds to thresholds obtained for pure-tones in a previous study by Heinrich and Schneider [(2006). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 119, 2316-2326], thresholds increased in an orderly fashion from markers with identical (within-channel) pure tones to different (between-channel) pure tones to complex sounds. This pattern of results was true for listeners of both ages although younger listeners had smaller thresholds overall.
M3 - Article
SN - 0001-4966
VL - 136
SP - 1797
EP - 1807
JO - The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
JF - The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
IS - 4
ER -