Abstract
This article addresses two central research questions relating to initial pre-trial detention under Article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Firstly, at what point does reasonable suspicion stop being sufficient for detention of an individual in initial pre-trial detention? Secondly, should the first judicial officer undertake a review as to whether there are alternatives to, or potential justification for, pre-trial detention or can this be carried out at a later stage? The article concludes, by reference to a case study on Armenia, that the acceptable length of this initial period of pre-trial detention can only be determined on a case by case basis and not on the application of a blanket period of time and that while the first judicial officer is not obliged to review the justifications for pre-trial detention, such review is desirable and at the very least such a review should be carried out expeditiously by a second judicial officer.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | European Human Rights Law Review |
| Publication status | Published - 2015 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Scope of Initial Pre-Trial Detention under the European Convention on Human Rights: An Armenian Case Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver