TY - JOUR
T1 - The shear testing programme - I. Weak lensing analysis of simulated ground-based observations
AU - Heymans, Catherine
AU - Van Waerbeke, Ludovic
AU - Bacon, David
AU - Berge, Joel
AU - Bernstein, Gary
AU - Bertin, Emmanuel
AU - Bridle, Sarah
AU - Brown, Michael L.
AU - Clowe, Douglas
AU - Dahle, Håkon
AU - Erben, Thomas
AU - Gray, Meghan
AU - Hetterscheidt, Marco
AU - Hoekstra, Henk
AU - Hudelot, Patrick
AU - Jarvis, Mike
AU - Kuijken, Konrad
AU - Margoniner, Vera
AU - Massey, Richard
AU - Mellier, Yannick
AU - Nakajima, Reiko
AU - Refregier, Alexandre
AU - Rhodes, Jason
AU - Schrabback, Tim
AU - Wittman, David
PY - 2006/5
Y1 - 2006/5
N2 - The Shear Testing Programme (STEP) is a collaborative project to improve the accuracy and reliability of all weak lensing measurements in preparation for the next generation of wide-field surveys. In this first STEP paper, we present the results of a blind analysis of simulated ground-based observations of relatively simple galaxy morphologies. The most successful methods are shown to achieve percent level accuracy. From the cosmic shear pipelines that have been used to constrain cosmology, we find weak lensing shear measured to an accuracy that is within the statistical errors of current weak lensing analyses, with shear measurements accurate to better than 7 per cent. The dominant source of measurement error is shown to arise from calibration uncertainties where the measured shear is over or underestimated by a constant multiplicative factor. This is of concern as calibration errors cannot be detected through standard diagnostic tests. The measured calibration errors appear to result from stellar contamination, false object detection, the shear measurement method itself, selection bias and/or the use of biased weights. Additive systematics (false detections of shear) resulting from residual point-spread function anisotropy are, in most cases, reduced to below an equivalent shear of 0.001, an order of magnitude below cosmic shear distortions on the scales probed by current surveys. Our results provide a snapshot view of the accuracy of current ground-based weak lensing methods and a benchmark upon which we can improve. To this end we provide descriptions of each method tested and include details of the eight different implementations of the commonly used Kaiser, Squires & Broadhurst method (KSB+) to aid the improvement of future KSB+ analyses. © 2006 RAS.
AB - The Shear Testing Programme (STEP) is a collaborative project to improve the accuracy and reliability of all weak lensing measurements in preparation for the next generation of wide-field surveys. In this first STEP paper, we present the results of a blind analysis of simulated ground-based observations of relatively simple galaxy morphologies. The most successful methods are shown to achieve percent level accuracy. From the cosmic shear pipelines that have been used to constrain cosmology, we find weak lensing shear measured to an accuracy that is within the statistical errors of current weak lensing analyses, with shear measurements accurate to better than 7 per cent. The dominant source of measurement error is shown to arise from calibration uncertainties where the measured shear is over or underestimated by a constant multiplicative factor. This is of concern as calibration errors cannot be detected through standard diagnostic tests. The measured calibration errors appear to result from stellar contamination, false object detection, the shear measurement method itself, selection bias and/or the use of biased weights. Additive systematics (false detections of shear) resulting from residual point-spread function anisotropy are, in most cases, reduced to below an equivalent shear of 0.001, an order of magnitude below cosmic shear distortions on the scales probed by current surveys. Our results provide a snapshot view of the accuracy of current ground-based weak lensing methods and a benchmark upon which we can improve. To this end we provide descriptions of each method tested and include details of the eight different implementations of the commonly used Kaiser, Squires & Broadhurst method (KSB+) to aid the improvement of future KSB+ analyses. © 2006 RAS.
KW - Cosmology: observations
KW - Gravitational lensing
KW - Large-scale structure of Universe
U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10198.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10198.x
M3 - Article
SN - 1365-2966
VL - 368
SP - 1323
EP - 1339
JO - Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
JF - Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
IS - 3
ER -