The use of different adhesive filling material and mass combinations to restore class II cavities under loading and shrinkage effects: a 3D-FEA

P. Ausiello; S. Ciaramella; A. De Benedictis; A. Lanzotti; J. P. M. Tribst; D. C. Watts

doi:10.1080/10255842.2020.1836168

The use of different adhesive filling material and mass combinations to restore class II cavities under loading and shrinkage effects: a 3D-FEA

P. Ausiello, S. Ciaramella, A. De Benedictis, A. Lanzotti, J. P. M. Tribst, D. C. Watts

Division of Dentistry (L5)

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

3D tooth models were virtually restored: flowable composite resin + bulk-fill composite (A), glass ionomer cement + bulk-fill composite (B) or adhesive + bulk-fill composite (C). Polymerization shrinkage and masticatory loads were simulated. All models exhibited the highest stress concentration at the enamel–restoration interfaces. A and C showed similar pattern with lower magnitude in A in comparison to C. B showed lower stress in dentine and C the highest cusps displacement. The use of glass ionomer cement or flowable composite resin in combination with a bulk-fill composite improved the biomechanical behavior of deep class II MO cavities.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	485-495
Number of pages	11
Journal	Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering
Volume	24
Issue number	5
Early online date	22 Oct 2020
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2020.1836168
Publication status	Published - 4 Apr 2021

Access to Document

10.1080/10255842.2020.1836168

The use of different adhesive filling material and mass combinations to restore class II cavities under loading and shrinkage effectsAccepted author manuscript, 1.48 MBLicence: CC BY

Cite this

Ausiello, P., Ciaramella, S., Benedictis, A. D., Lanzotti, A., Tribst, J. P. M., & Watts, D. C. (2021). The use of different adhesive filling material and mass combinations to restore class II cavities under loading and shrinkage effects: a 3D-FEA. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, 24(5), 485-495. https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2020.1836168

@article{eb9020aba0034fceafcc45699fc81766,

title = "The use of different adhesive filling material and mass combinations to restore class II cavities under loading and shrinkage effects: a 3D-FEA",

abstract = "3D tooth models were virtually restored: flowable composite resin + bulk-fill composite (A), glass ionomer cement + bulk-fill composite (B) or adhesive + bulk-fill composite (C). Polymerization shrinkage and masticatory loads were simulated. All models exhibited the highest stress concentration at the enamel–restoration interfaces. A and C showed similar pattern with lower magnitude in A in comparison to C. B showed lower stress in dentine and C the highest cusps displacement. The use of glass ionomer cement or flowable composite resin in combination with a bulk-fill composite improved the biomechanical behavior of deep class II MO cavities. ",

author = "P. Ausiello and S. Ciaramella and Benedictis, {A. De} and A. Lanzotti and Tribst, {J. P. M.} and Watts, {D. C.}",

year = "2021",

month = apr,

day = "4",

doi = "10.1080/10255842.2020.1836168",

language = "English",

volume = "24",

pages = "485--495",

journal = "Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering",

issn = "1025-5842",

publisher = "Informa Healthcare",

number = "5",

}

The use of different adhesive filling material and mass combinations to restore class II cavities under loading and shrinkage effects: a 3D-FEA. / Ausiello, P.; Ciaramella, S.; Benedictis, A. De et al.
In: Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Vol. 24, No. 5, 04.04.2021, p. 485-495.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The use of different adhesive filling material and mass combinations to restore class II cavities under loading and shrinkage effects: a 3D-FEA

AU - Ausiello, P.

AU - Ciaramella, S.

AU - Benedictis, A. De

AU - Lanzotti, A.

AU - Tribst, J. P. M.

AU - Watts, D. C.

PY - 2021/4/4

Y1 - 2021/4/4

N2 - 3D tooth models were virtually restored: flowable composite resin + bulk-fill composite (A), glass ionomer cement + bulk-fill composite (B) or adhesive + bulk-fill composite (C). Polymerization shrinkage and masticatory loads were simulated. All models exhibited the highest stress concentration at the enamel–restoration interfaces. A and C showed similar pattern with lower magnitude in A in comparison to C. B showed lower stress in dentine and C the highest cusps displacement. The use of glass ionomer cement or flowable composite resin in combination with a bulk-fill composite improved the biomechanical behavior of deep class II MO cavities.

AB - 3D tooth models were virtually restored: flowable composite resin + bulk-fill composite (A), glass ionomer cement + bulk-fill composite (B) or adhesive + bulk-fill composite (C). Polymerization shrinkage and masticatory loads were simulated. All models exhibited the highest stress concentration at the enamel–restoration interfaces. A and C showed similar pattern with lower magnitude in A in comparison to C. B showed lower stress in dentine and C the highest cusps displacement. The use of glass ionomer cement or flowable composite resin in combination with a bulk-fill composite improved the biomechanical behavior of deep class II MO cavities.

U2 - 10.1080/10255842.2020.1836168

DO - 10.1080/10255842.2020.1836168

M3 - Article

SN - 1025-5842

VL - 24

SP - 485

EP - 495

JO - Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering

JF - Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering

IS - 5

ER -

The use of different adhesive filling material and mass combinations to restore class II cavities under loading and shrinkage effects: a 3D-FEA

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this