The use of missing values in proteomic data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry to enable disease activity discrimination

Kathryn McGurk, Arianna Dagliati, Davide Chiasserini, Dave Lee, Darren Plant, Ivona Baricevic-Jones, Janet Kelsall, Rachael Eineman, Rachel Reed, Bethany Geary, Richard Unwin, Anna Nicolaou, Bernard Keavney, Anne Barton, Anthony Whetton, Nophar Geifman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Motivation: Data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry allows for comprehensive peptide detection and relative quantification than standard data-dependent approaches. While less prone to missing values, these still exist. Current approaches for handling so-called missingness have challenges. We hypothesized that non-random missingness is a useful biological measure and demonstrate the importance of analysing missingness for proteomic discovery within a longitudinal study of disease activity.
Results: The magnitude of missingness did not correlate with mean peptide concentration. The magnitude of missingness for each protein strongly correlated between collection time points (baseline, 3 months, 6 months; R = 0.95-0.97, CI = 0.94, 0.97) indicating little time-dependent effect. This allowed for the identification of proteins with outlier levels of missingness that differenti-ate between patient groups characterized by different patterns of disease activity. The association of these proteins with disease activity was confirmed by machine learning techniques.
Conclusion: Our novel approach complements analyses on complete observations and other missing value strategies in biomarker prediction of disease activity.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2217-2223
Number of pages7
JournalBioinformatics
Volume36
Issue number7
Early online date2 Dec 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2020

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The use of missing values in proteomic data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry to enable disease activity discrimination'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this