The use of structure information to increase alignment accuracy does not aid homologue detection with profile HMMs

Sam Griffiths-Jones, Alex Bateman

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Motivation: The best quality multiple sequence alignments are generally considered to derive from structural superposition. However, no previous work has studied the relative performance of profile hidden Markov models (HMMs) derived from such alignments. Therefore several alignment methods have been used to generate multiple sequence alignments from 348 structurally aligned families in the HOMSTRAD database. The performance of profile HMMs derived from the structural and sequence-based alignments has been assessed for homologue detection. Results: The best alignment methods studied here correctly align nearly 80% of residues with respect to structure alignments. Alignment quality and model sensitivity are found to be dependent on average number, length, and identity of sequences in the alignment. The striking conclusion is that, although structural data may improve the quality of multiple sequence alignments, this does not add to the ability of the derived profile HMMs to find sequence homologues.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1243-1249
    Number of pages6
    JournalBioinformatics
    Volume18
    Issue number9
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Sept 2002

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The use of structure information to increase alignment accuracy does not aid homologue detection with profile HMMs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this