The utility of established prognostic scores in COVID-19 hospital admissions: A multi-centre prospective evaluation of CURB-65, NEWS2, and qSOFA

Patrick Bradley, Freddy Frost, Kukatharmini Tharmaratnam, Dan Gower Wootton, Mahin Ahmad, Joshua Aigbirior, Alex Bull, Ruth Cade, Kate Grant, Charlotte King, Ayesha Kumar, Farheen Kutubuddin, Konstantinos Liatsikos, Muhammed Haris Mir, Eman Nasr, Laurence Pearmain, Rachel Penfold, Sarika Raghunath, Victoria Randles, Ryan RobinsonRan Wang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic is ongoing yet, due to the lack of a COVID-19 specific tool, clinicians must use pre-existing illness severity scores for initial prognostication. However, the validity of such scores in COVID-19 is unknown. Methods The North West Collaborative Organization for Respiratory Research (NW-CORR) performed a multi-centre prospective evaluation of adult patients admitted to hospital with confirmed COVID-19 during a two-week period in April 2020. Clinical variables measured as part of usual care at presentation to hospital were recorded, including the CURB-65, NEWS2, and qSOFA scores. The primary outcome of interest was 30-day mortality. Results Data were collected for 830 people with COVID-19 admitted across 7 hospitals. By 30 days, a total of 300 (36.1%) had died and 142 (17.1%) had been in ICU. All scores underestimated mortality compared to their original validation in non-COVID-19 populations, and overall prognostic performance was generally poor. Among the ‘low risk’ categories (CURB-65
Original languageEnglish
JournalBMJ Open Respiratory Research
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 18 Jul 2020

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The utility of established prognostic scores in COVID-19 hospital admissions: A multi-centre prospective evaluation of CURB-65, NEWS2, and qSOFA'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this