TY - JOUR
T1 - The value of fast-acting insulin aspart compared with insulin aspart for patients with diabetes mellitus treated with bolus insulin from a UK health care system perspective
AU - Leelarathna, Lalantha
AU - Ashley, Donna
AU - Fidler, Carrie
AU - Parekh, Witesh
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - Background: Fast-acting insulin aspart is a new formulation of the rapid-acting insulin analogue insulin aspart and represents an advancement over current rapid-acting insulin analogues in terms of onset of action and postprandial glucose control. The objective of the current analysis was to demonstrate the cost impact of prescribing fast-acting insulin aspart instead of insulin aspart, to highlight the value of fast-acting insulin aspart for the treatment of people with diabetes requiring mealtime insulin. Methods: A cost-impact analysis was conducted from the perspective of the UK National Health Service (NHS). The analysis excluded patients’ out-of-pocket expenses, carers’ costs and lost productivity. The time horizon of the analysis was 1 year, and no discounting was therefore applied. Results: The displacement of insulin aspart with fast-acting insulin aspart is cost neutral for the UK NHS. Fast-acting insulin aspart is at price parity to insulin aspart in terms of the vial and Penfill® cartridge and is available in the FlexTouch® pen at the same price as the insulin aspart FlexPen® (and thus cheaper than the insulin aspart FlexTouch® pen). Patients using the insulin aspart FlexPen® will be upgraded to the FlexTouch® pen device, which is preferred by patients and healthcare professionals, on switching to fast-acting insulin aspart, at no additional cost. Conclusions: Fast-acting insulin aspart offers additional clinical benefit but at no additional cost when compared with insulin aspart, and thus provides value to the UK NHS.
AB - Background: Fast-acting insulin aspart is a new formulation of the rapid-acting insulin analogue insulin aspart and represents an advancement over current rapid-acting insulin analogues in terms of onset of action and postprandial glucose control. The objective of the current analysis was to demonstrate the cost impact of prescribing fast-acting insulin aspart instead of insulin aspart, to highlight the value of fast-acting insulin aspart for the treatment of people with diabetes requiring mealtime insulin. Methods: A cost-impact analysis was conducted from the perspective of the UK National Health Service (NHS). The analysis excluded patients’ out-of-pocket expenses, carers’ costs and lost productivity. The time horizon of the analysis was 1 year, and no discounting was therefore applied. Results: The displacement of insulin aspart with fast-acting insulin aspart is cost neutral for the UK NHS. Fast-acting insulin aspart is at price parity to insulin aspart in terms of the vial and Penfill® cartridge and is available in the FlexTouch® pen at the same price as the insulin aspart FlexPen® (and thus cheaper than the insulin aspart FlexTouch® pen). Patients using the insulin aspart FlexPen® will be upgraded to the FlexTouch® pen device, which is preferred by patients and healthcare professionals, on switching to fast-acting insulin aspart, at no additional cost. Conclusions: Fast-acting insulin aspart offers additional clinical benefit but at no additional cost when compared with insulin aspart, and thus provides value to the UK NHS.
KW - bolus insulin
KW - fast-acting insulin aspart
KW - glycaemic control
KW - postprandial glucose
KW - price parity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045077470&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/2042018818766816
DO - 10.1177/2042018818766816
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85045077470
SN - 2042-0188
JO - Therapeutic Advances in Endocrinology and Metabolism
JF - Therapeutic Advances in Endocrinology and Metabolism
ER -