Abstract
This paper compares the methods used to account for sheets thinner than the cell size of the FDTD method. The comparison relies on the reflection and transmission of plane waves. It is shown that the Maloney and Smith method is the best. In contrast to the other methods, it provides
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation |
Early online date | 9 Oct 2018 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2018 |
Keywords
- FDTD methods
- electromagnetic coupling
- reflection coefficient
Research Beacons, Institutes and Platforms
- Manchester Institute for Collaborative Research on Ageing