Threats to group value, domain-specific self-esteem and intergroup discrimination amongst minimal and national groups

John A. Hunter, Sarah L. Cox, Kerry O'Brien, Maurice Stringer, Mike Boyes, Mike Banks, Jillian G. Hayhurst, Maria Crawford

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    The research reported in this investigation sought to examine the self-esteem hypothesis (SEH) using measures of domain-specific and public collective self-esteem (CSE). Two studies were conducted. Each tested both propositions of the SEH. The first study revealed that minimal group members (a) experienced an increase in that domain of self-esteem judged to be relatively more important to the in-group, following the display of in-group favouritism and (b) that minimal group members with low public CSE (and who thus believed that the in-group was negatively evaluated by the out-group) showed enhanced levels of in-group favouritism. The second study, which utilized the members of real social categories (i.e. New Zealanders and Australians) and negative outcome allocations (i.e. white noise) revealed identical findings. The theoretical implications of these results are discussed. © 2005 The British Psychological Society.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)329-353
    Number of pages24
    JournalBritish Journal of Social Psychology
    Volume44
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Sept 2005

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Threats to group value, domain-specific self-esteem and intergroup discrimination amongst minimal and national groups'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this