To Tell or not to tell: Revealing the diagnosis in MS

A Raphael, CH Hawkes, JL Bernat

Research output: Contribution to conferencePoster

Abstract

We review briefly 1) the history of patient-physician relationship and its evolution from aphysician-centered to patient-centered model; 2) the impact of the McDonald Criteria forMultiple Sclerosis (MS); 3) why it is important to tell patients of their diagnosis; 4) howphysicians should disclose the diagnosis 5) Dealing with suspected MS; and 6) Prognosis and treatment. For the majority of clinically definite MS patients we advocate disclosure, identify steps for physicians to communicate the diagnosis and propose a framework to follow when revealing a diagnosis of MS.
Original languageEnglish
Publication statusPublished - 20 Feb 2013
Event3rd annual primary care ethics conference: Primary care ethics - the ordinary and the extraordinary - Royal Society of Medicine, 1 Wimpole Street, London, W1G 0AE
Duration: 20 Feb 201320 Feb 2013

Conference

Conference3rd annual primary care ethics conference: Primary care ethics - the ordinary and the extraordinary
CityRoyal Society of Medicine, 1 Wimpole Street, London, W1G 0AE
Period20/02/1320/02/13

Keywords

  • Multiple Sclerosis; disclosure of diagnosis; patient-centered medicine; Impact of McDonald criteria; communication techniques

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'To Tell or not to tell: Revealing the diagnosis in MS'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this