TY - JOUR
T1 - To what extent is capital expenditure in UK Higher Education meeting the pedagogical needs of staff and students?
AU - Jones, Steven
AU - Sutcliffe, Michael
AU - Harris, Diane
AU - Bragg, Joanna
PY - 2016/8/9
Y1 - 2016/8/9
N2 - Capital expenditure at United Kingdom (UK) universities is rapidly rising, with new buildings erected on the premise that national and international competitiveness must be maintained. We examine students’ engagement with and conceptualisation of university estate, and explore broader questions about the extent to which building design can support, and indeed change, students’ approaches to learning. Drawing on data collected from 10 staff members and over 200 students at a major UK institution, including detailed one-to-one interviews, we capture users’ often complex interactions with their university environment. Our findings confirm that when asked what would most improve their learning experience, students do not rank building design highly; interactional factors, such as contact time with staff, are considered more valuable. Our conclusion is that returns on capital investment would be boosted if pedagogical needs were prioritised more highly in the design of university buildings, and pedagogical opportunities communicated more clearly to users upon completion.
AB - Capital expenditure at United Kingdom (UK) universities is rapidly rising, with new buildings erected on the premise that national and international competitiveness must be maintained. We examine students’ engagement with and conceptualisation of university estate, and explore broader questions about the extent to which building design can support, and indeed change, students’ approaches to learning. Drawing on data collected from 10 staff members and over 200 students at a major UK institution, including detailed one-to-one interviews, we capture users’ often complex interactions with their university environment. Our findings confirm that when asked what would most improve their learning experience, students do not rank building design highly; interactional factors, such as contact time with staff, are considered more valuable. Our conclusion is that returns on capital investment would be boosted if pedagogical needs were prioritised more highly in the design of university buildings, and pedagogical opportunities communicated more clearly to users upon completion.
KW - student satisfaction and dissatisfaction
KW - Higher Education
KW - university buildings
U2 - 10.1080/1360080X.2016.1181881
DO - 10.1080/1360080X.2016.1181881
M3 - Article
SN - 1469-9508
VL - 38
JO - Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management
JF - Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management
IS - 4
ER -