Toward the Scientific Study of Polytheism: Beyond Forced-Choice Measures of Religious Belief

Peter Gries*, Jenny Su, David Schak

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This article argues that zero-sum, forced-choice approaches to measuring religious belief do not work well outside of the Abrahamic world. Positive-sum approaches to measuring religious beliefs (in the plural) are better suited to the study of polytheistic societies. Using results from a nationally representative survey conducted in 2011 Taiwan, we demonstrate that in a polytheistic society like Taiwan, religious belief is not zero sum. We also contrast our results with those of the Taiwan Social Change Survey (TSCS), and seek to show that our positive-sum approach to measuring religious beliefs can help us better understand the disparate causes and consequences of different religious beliefs in polytheistic societies. The challenge of Christocentrism in quantitative studies of religion is also discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)623-637
Number of pages15
JournalJournal for the Scientific Study of Religion
Volume51
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2012

Keywords

  • Ancestor worship
  • Buddhism
  • Folk religion.
  • Measurement
  • Polytheism
  • Religious belief
  • Survey research
  • Taiwan
  • Taoism

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Toward the Scientific Study of Polytheism: Beyond Forced-Choice Measures of Religious Belief'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this