Towards a dialogue for practice: Reconciling Social Role Valorization and the Social Model of Disability

David Race, Kathy Boxall, Iain Carson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This article offers a comparative evaluation of two approaches to the organisation of learning disability services and individualised support for people with learning difficulties - Social Role Valorization (SRV) and the Social Model of Disability. Brief descriptive accounts of each approach are given, together with reference to critiques of SRV from UK academics, including those writing from a Social Model perspective. The applicability of the Social Model to people with learning difficulties, and critiques of their marginalization by it, are also discussed. The paper goes on to argue that whilst the analysis of devaluation is similar between the two approaches, academic debates have focussed more on ideological differences, thus losing the opportunity for a sharing of their respective contributions to addressing oppression. The possibility of a 'dialogue for practice' is raised. © 2005 Taylor & Francis Group Ltd.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)507-521
Number of pages14
JournalDisability and Society
Volume20
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2005

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Towards a dialogue for practice: Reconciling Social Role Valorization and the Social Model of Disability'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this