Towards Gaussian Process Regression modelling of a Urea Force Field

Tomasz Bukowy, Matthew Brown, Paul Popelier

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

FFLUX is a next-generation, machine-learnt force field built on three cornerstones: Quantum Chemical Topology, Gaussian process regression and (high-rank) multipolar electrostatics. It is capable of performing molecular dynamics with near-quantum accuracy at a lower computational cost than standard ab initio molecular dynamics. Previous work with FFLUX was concerned with water and formamide. In this study, we go one step further and challenge FFLUX to model urea, a larger and more flexible system. In result, we have trained urea models at the B3LYP/aug-cc-pVTZ level of theory, with a mean absolute error of 0.4 kJ mol-1, and a maximum prediction error below 7.0 kJ mol-1. To test their performance in molecular dynamics simulations, two sets of FFLUX geometry optimisations were carried out: 5 dimers corresponding to energy minima and 75 random dimers. The 5 dimers were recovered with a root mean square deviation below 0.1 Å with respect to their ab initio references. Out of the 75 random dimers, 68% converged to the qualitatively same dimer as those obtained at ab initio level. Furthermore, we have ranked the 5 FFLUX optimised dimers in order of their relative FFLUX single-point energies and compared them with the ab initio method. The energy ranking fully agreed but for one cross-over between two successive minima. Finally, we have demonstrated the importance of geometry-dependent (i.e. flexible) multipole moments, showing that the lack of multipole moment flexibility can lead to average errors in the total intermolecular electrostatic energy of more than two orders of magnitude.
Original languageEnglish
JournalThe Journal of Physical Chemistry A
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Sept 2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Towards Gaussian Process Regression modelling of a Urea Force Field'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this