Trade liberalisation in environmental services: Why so little progress?

  • Colin Kirkpatrick
  • , Clive George
  • , Serban S. Scrieciu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

WTO-led trade liberalisation in environmental services is often seen as having considerable potential for generating 'win-win' outcomes for the economy and the environment. Despite this, progress in liberalising environmental services within the GATS framework has been limited. This paper argues that a major barrier to progress in environmental services liberalisation is uncertainty about the development impact of environmental services liberalisation in developing countries. We develop this argument using the example of water services, where market opening needs to be accompanied by effective domestic regulatory measures. The paper argues that uncertainty on the interpretation of the GATS rules on domestic regulation acts as a further constraint on countries' willingness to make new commitments for trade liberalisation in environmental services. The final section of the paper makes a number of proposals for 'accompanying policies' that may be needed to be adopted if progress is to be made in meeting the Doha Development Agenda's commitment to the reduction or elimination of barriers to trade in environmental services. Copyright © 2006 The Berkeley Electronic Press. All rights reserved.
Original languageEnglish
Article number4
JournalGlobal Economy Journal
Volume6
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 10 - Reduced Inequalities
    SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
  2. SDG 17 - Partnerships for the Goals
    SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals

Keywords

  • Environmental services
  • Trade liberalisation
  • WTO

Research Beacons, Institutes and Platforms

  • Global Development Institute

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Trade liberalisation in environmental services: Why so little progress?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this