Treating patients who strain the research psychotherapy paradigm

John C. Markowitz, Matthew Kaplowitz, Eun Jung Suh, Kevin B. Meehan, Yuval Neria, Hanske Jonker, Alexandra Rafaeli, Karina Lovell

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Clinical trials of psychotherapy require diagnostic homogeneity, which implies a convergence of clinical presentations. Yet research study patients present diversely, and patients who do not fit a treatment paradigm may greatly complicate delivery of the study psychotherapy. The research literature has not addressed this issue. The authors use case illustrations of three psychotherapies-Prolonged Exposure, Relaxation Therapy, and Interpersonal Psychotherapy-from an ongoing psychotherapy outcome trial of posttraumatic stress disorder to describe psychotherapeutic responses to complex, "atypical" patients who strain standard treatment paradigms. Therapists required flexibility, and occasionally deviations from strict protocol, in treating heterodox patients. Such heterogeneity of presentation may have implications for psychotherapy outcome in research trials. Despite lack of discussion in the literature, many trials may face such issues. © 2012 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)594-597
    Number of pages3
    JournalJournal of Nervous and Mental Disease
    Volume200
    Issue number7
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jul 2012

    Keywords

    • deviation
    • postraumatic stress disorder (PTSD)
    • Psychotherapy
    • treatment paradigm

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Treating patients who strain the research psychotherapy paradigm'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this