Twenty years of strategy as practice scholarship in top journals: a systematic review

Luis Javier Serrano Tamayo, Paul Chan, Paul Blackwell

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

    209 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    This paper has intended to compile the most relevant research on strategy as practice during twenty years of scholarship. A systematic review protocol allowed consulting and filtering the most relevant literature in academic databases, focused on the most influential journals. In 90 filtered papers and 54 additional documents, this review shows the current methods used in strategy as practice research and its major contributions to organisational studies. The discussion revealed that research on strategy as practice has been focused at the managerial levels, opening space for inclusion of grassroots levels of organisations in future research.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationBritish Academy of Management Conference 2016
    Number of pages26
    Publication statusAccepted/In press - 18 Apr 2016
    EventBritish Academy of Management - Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, United Kingdom
    Duration: 6 Sept 20168 Sept 2016

    Conference

    ConferenceBritish Academy of Management
    Country/TerritoryUnited Kingdom
    CityNewcastle-upon-Tyne
    Period6/09/168/09/16

    Keywords

    • Strategy as practice
    • Systematic review
    • Massification of strategy
    • Inclusion

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Twenty years of strategy as practice scholarship in top journals: a systematic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this