UK consensus statement on the diagnosis of inducible laryngeal obstruction in light of the COVID‐19 pandemic

Jemma Haines, Karen Esposito, Claire Slinger, Nicola Pargeter, Jennifer Murphy, Julia Selby, Kathryn Prior, Adel Mansur, Aashish Vyas, Andrew E. Stanton, Ian Sabroe, James H. Hull, Stephen J. Fowler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Prior to the COVID‐19 pandemic, laryngoscopy was the mandatory gold standard for the accurate assessment and diagnosis of inducible laryngeal obstruction. However, upper airway endoscopy is considered an aerosol‐generating procedure in professional guidelines, meaning routine procedures are highly challenging and the availability of laryngoscopy is reduced. In response, we have convened a multidisciplinary panel with broad experience in managing this disease and agreed a recommended strategy for presumptive diagnosis in patients who cannot have laryngoscopy performed due to pandemic restrictions. To maintain clinical standards whilst ensuring patient safety, we discuss the importance of triage, information gathering, symptom assessment and early review of response to treatment. The consensus recommendations will also be potentially relevant to other future situations where access to laryngoscopy is restricted, although we emphasize that this investigation remains the gold standard.
Original languageEnglish
JournalClinical and Experimental Allergy
Early online date8 Oct 2020
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 8 Oct 2020

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'UK consensus statement on the diagnosis of inducible laryngeal obstruction in light of the COVID‐19 pandemic'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this