@article{0fe9ce3521a64b49a280a413cb486961,
title = "Understanding Concordance in Health Behaviours among Couples: Evidence from the Bowel Cancer Screening Programme in England",
abstract = "Health behaviours depend upon preferences and individuals{\textquoteright} assessments of the long-term costs and benefits to themselves and others. We investigate family spillovers by examining couple concordance in uptake of bowel cancer screening using the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. We exploit the sharp age cut-off for screening programme eligibility at age 60 and use polynomial regression to study how initial screening participation depends upon partner{\textquoteright}s uptake. We find that individuals with screened older partners are 42 percentage points more likely to screen than individuals with non-screened older partners, whose probability of screening is similar to comparable singles. Additionally, eligible but non-screened individuals update their screening behaviour if their younger partners participate in screening once they became eligible. We find heterogeneity in this concordance that is consistent with learning among partners being the most likely mechanism driving couple concordance. The findings have important implications for the optimal design of population-wide screening campaigns.",
keywords = "Cancer screening, Family spillover, Health behaviours, Household behaviour",
author = "Igor Francetic and Rachel Meacock and Matt Sutton",
note = "Funding Information: The study used data from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA), which was developed by a team of researchers based at University College London, NatCen Social Research, the Institute for Fiscal Studies, the University of Manchester and the University of East Anglia. The data were collected by NatCen Social Research. The funding is currently provided by the National Institute on Aging in the US, and a consortium of UK government departments coordinated by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR). Funding for the survey has also been received by the Economic and Social Research Council. This work was supported by the Medical Research Council [grant MR/R013314/1]. MS is a NIHR Senior Investigator. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. The authors are grateful to HOPE seminar participants at the University of Manchester, Prof. Joan Costa-i-Font, and APHEC workshop participants at the University of Genova for useful feedback on previous versions of the manuscript. Funding Information: This work was supported by the Medical Research Council [grant MR/R013314/1]. Funding Information: The study used data from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA), which was developed by a team of researchers based at University College London, NatCen Social Research, the Institute for Fiscal Studies, the University of Manchester and the University of East Anglia. The data were collected by NatCen Social Research. The funding is currently provided by the National Institute on Aging in the US, and a consortium of UK government departments coordinated by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR). Funding for the survey has also been received by the Economic and Social Research Council. This work was supported by the Medical Research Council [grant MR/R013314/1]. MS is a NIHR Senior Investigator. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. The authors are grateful to HOPE seminar participants at the University of Manchester, Prof. Joan Costa-i-Font, and APHEC workshop participants at the University of Genova for useful feedback on previous versions of the manuscript. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 The Author(s)",
year = "2022",
month = aug,
day = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.jebo.2022.08.001",
language = "English",
volume = "201",
pages = "310--345",
journal = "Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization",
issn = "0167-2681",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
}