Abstract
Background Ensuring efficient use and allocation of limited resources is crucial to achieving the UHC goal. Performance-based financing, which provides financial incentives for health providers reaching pre-defined targets would be expected to enhance technical efficiency across facilities by promoting an output-oriented payment system. However, there is no study which has systematically assessed efficiency scores across facilities before and after the introduction of PBF. This paper seeks to fill this knowledge gap.
Methods We used data of P4P evaluation related to healthcare inputs (staff, equipment, medicines) and outputs (outpatient consultations and institutional deliveries) from 75 health facilities implementing P4P in Pwani region, and 75 from comparison districts in Tanzania. We measured technical efficiency using Data Envelope Analysis (DEA), and obtained efficiency scores across facilities before and after P4P scheme. We analysed which factors influence technical efficiency by regressing the efficiency scores over a number of contextual factors. We also tested the impact of PBF on efficiency through a difference-in-differences regression analysis.
Results The overall technical efficiency scores ranged between 0.40–0.65 for hospitals and health centres, and around 0.20 for dispensaries. Only 21% of hospitals and health centres were efficient when outpatient consultations and deliveries were considered as output, and <3% out of all facilities were efficient when outpatient consultations only were considered as outputs. Higher efficiency scores were significantly associated with the level of care (hospital and health centre), and wealthier catchment populations. Despite no evidence of P4P effect on efficiency on average, P4P improved efficiency among public facilities.
Conclusion Most facilities were not operating at their full capacity which reflects a significant wastage of resources. A better understanding of the production process at the facility level and of how different healthcare financing reforms affects efficiency is needed.
Methods We used data of P4P evaluation related to healthcare inputs (staff, equipment, medicines) and outputs (outpatient consultations and institutional deliveries) from 75 health facilities implementing P4P in Pwani region, and 75 from comparison districts in Tanzania. We measured technical efficiency using Data Envelope Analysis (DEA), and obtained efficiency scores across facilities before and after P4P scheme. We analysed which factors influence technical efficiency by regressing the efficiency scores over a number of contextual factors. We also tested the impact of PBF on efficiency through a difference-in-differences regression analysis.
Results The overall technical efficiency scores ranged between 0.40–0.65 for hospitals and health centres, and around 0.20 for dispensaries. Only 21% of hospitals and health centres were efficient when outpatient consultations and deliveries were considered as output, and <3% out of all facilities were efficient when outpatient consultations only were considered as outputs. Higher efficiency scores were significantly associated with the level of care (hospital and health centre), and wealthier catchment populations. Despite no evidence of P4P effect on efficiency on average, P4P improved efficiency among public facilities.
Conclusion Most facilities were not operating at their full capacity which reflects a significant wastage of resources. A better understanding of the production process at the facility level and of how different healthcare financing reforms affects efficiency is needed.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | BMJ Global Health |
Early online date | 30 May 2020 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 30 May 2020 |
Keywords
- health financing
- efficiency
- data envelopment analysis
- pay-for-performance
- Tanzania