Understanding Outcomes in a Randomized Controlled Trial of a Ward-based Intervention on Psychiatric Inpatient Wards: A Qualitative Analysis of Staff and Patient Experiences

Katherine Berry, Gillian Haddock, Stephen Kellett, Yvonne Awenat, Karolina Szpak, Christine Barrowclough

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

121 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objective: Team formulation is advocated to improve quality of care in mental health care and evidence from a recent U.K.-based trial supports its use in inpatient settings. This study aimed to identify the effects of formulation on practice from the perspectives of staff and patient participating in the trial, including barriers and enhancers to implementing the intervention. Method: We carried out semistructured interviews with 57 staff and 20 patients. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: Main outcomes were: improved staff understanding of patients, better team collaboration and increased staff awareness of their own feelings. Key contextual factors were as follows: overcoming both staff and patient anxiety, unwelcome expert versus collaborative stance, competing demands, and management support. Conclusion: Team formulation should be implemented to improve quality of care in inpatient settings and larger definitive trials should be carried out to assess the effect of this intervention on patient outcomes.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Clinical Psychology
Early online date27 Dec 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Keywords

  • Formulation
  • Psychiatric inpatient
  • Psychosis
  • Qualitative analysis
  • Therapeutic relationships

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Understanding Outcomes in a Randomized Controlled Trial of a Ward-based Intervention on Psychiatric Inpatient Wards: A Qualitative Analysis of Staff and Patient Experiences'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this