TY - JOUR
T1 - Unmet supportive care needs, health status and minimum costs in survivors of malignant melanoma
AU - Davies, Linda
AU - Hayhurst, Karen
AU - Lorigan, Paul
AU - Molassiotis, A
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
PY - 2018/3
Y1 - 2018/3
N2 - We explored the relationship between unmet care needs, health status, health utility and costs in people treated for melanoma via a cross-sectional follow-up survey (N = 455) 3 months to 5 years after complete resection of stage I–III cutaneous malignant melanoma. 51% (n = 232) had unmet care needs. This group had higher mean resource use, estimated conservatively (£28 vs. £10 per person) and worse overall health. Mean health-related utility index (AQoL6D) was 0.763 (95% CI 0.74; 0.79) in those with self-reported unmet need vs. 0.903 (0.89; 0.92) in those with no unmet need. Melanoma survivors with unmet need had worse outcomes in terms of anxiety (HADS 6.86 vs. 4.29), depression (HADS 4.29 vs. 2.01), overall quality of life (QoL: FACT-M 84.2 vs. 96.5). Higher resource use was associated with younger age (r
s = −.29, p <.001), older school-leaving age (r
s =.21, p <.001), reduced health utility (r
s = −.14, p =.005), higher anxiety (r
s =.22, p <.001), higher depression (r
s =.16, p =.001) and lower QoL (overall r
s = −.24, p <.001; melanoma QoL r
s = −.20, p <.001; surgery QoL r
s = −.19, p <.001). Lower health outcomes indicate increased service use, suggesting that interventions to address unmet need and improve health outcomes may reduce health costs. Integrated clinical and economic evaluations of interventions that target unmet need in melanoma survivors are required.
AB - We explored the relationship between unmet care needs, health status, health utility and costs in people treated for melanoma via a cross-sectional follow-up survey (N = 455) 3 months to 5 years after complete resection of stage I–III cutaneous malignant melanoma. 51% (n = 232) had unmet care needs. This group had higher mean resource use, estimated conservatively (£28 vs. £10 per person) and worse overall health. Mean health-related utility index (AQoL6D) was 0.763 (95% CI 0.74; 0.79) in those with self-reported unmet need vs. 0.903 (0.89; 0.92) in those with no unmet need. Melanoma survivors with unmet need had worse outcomes in terms of anxiety (HADS 6.86 vs. 4.29), depression (HADS 4.29 vs. 2.01), overall quality of life (QoL: FACT-M 84.2 vs. 96.5). Higher resource use was associated with younger age (r
s = −.29, p <.001), older school-leaving age (r
s =.21, p <.001), reduced health utility (r
s = −.14, p =.005), higher anxiety (r
s =.22, p <.001), higher depression (r
s =.16, p =.001) and lower QoL (overall r
s = −.24, p <.001; melanoma QoL r
s = −.20, p <.001; surgery QoL r
s = −.19, p <.001). Lower health outcomes indicate increased service use, suggesting that interventions to address unmet need and improve health outcomes may reduce health costs. Integrated clinical and economic evaluations of interventions that target unmet need in melanoma survivors are required.
KW - costs
KW - health economics
KW - health utility
KW - service utilisation
KW - supportive care
KW - unmet needs
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85040338994&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/unmet-supportive-care-needs-health-status-minimum-costs-survivors-malignant-melanoma
U2 - 10.1111/ecc.12811
DO - 10.1111/ecc.12811
M3 - Article
SN - 0961-5423
VL - 27
SP - 1
EP - 12
JO - European Journal of Cancer Care
JF - European Journal of Cancer Care
IS - 2
M1 - e12811
ER -