Urban regeneration and mental health

Peter Huxley, Sherrill Evans, M. Leese, C. Gately, Anne Rogers, R. Thomas, B. Robson

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


    Objective. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of an urban regeneration project on mental health. Method. A longitudinal study was made with 22-month follow-up in a Single Regeneration Budget area, and matched control area in South Manchester. A total of 1344 subjects responded to a postal questionnaire survey. The main outcome measures were GHQ 12 (mental health) status, MANSA (Life satisfaction), and GP use. Results. Mental health outcome in the index and control areas showed no improvement over time. Health satisfaction declined slightly in the index compared to the control area. GP use was unchanged. Restricted opportunities, a variable closely related to mental health, were not removed by the urban regeneration initiative. Conclusions. The urban regeneration initiative may have had little impact because it failed to address the concerns of local residents and failed to remove restricted opportunities, which appeared to be the key factor. A longer follow-up period may be required to demonstrate an effect.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)280-285
    Number of pages5
    JournalSocial psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology
    Issue number4
    Publication statusPublished - Apr 2004


    • Mental health
    • Restricted opportunities
    • Urban regeneration


    Dive into the research topics of 'Urban regeneration and mental health'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this