Use of evidence from systematic reviews to inform commissioning decisions: A case study

Duncan Chambers, Rod Grant, Erica Warren, Sally Anne Pearson, Paul Wilson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Systematic reviews provide high-level evidence but there are barriers to their use by policy makers. This paper reports the preparation and evaluation of an evidence briefing, using systematic reviews and other existing sources of synthesised evidence, to support a possible reorganisation of services for young people with eating disorders in an English primary care trust. There was no evidence of differences in outcomes between community, outpatient and specialist inpatient treatment. The provision of specialist outpatient services appeared most cost-effective. The commissioning group agreed to move towards providing services on an outpatient basis. This work suggests that evidence briefings based on systematic reviews warrant further methodological development and evaluation. © The Policy Press • 2012 • ISSN 1744 2648.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)141-148
Number of pages7
JournalEvidence and Policy
Volume8
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2012

Keywords

  • Anorexia nervosa
  • Economic evaluations
  • Service delivery
  • Systematic reviews

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Use of evidence from systematic reviews to inform commissioning decisions: A case study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this