Usefulness of post-assessment reports in a paediatric low vision clinic: A questionnaire survey of parents and education professionals

Julie Lennon*, Robert Harper, Chris Lloyd, Sus Biswas

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    This survey aimed to evaluate how helpful parents and those working in the educational setting found written low vision assessment reports. A questionnaire survey was sent to 25 parents and to the corresponding and relevant member of the educational team for each of the 25 children. All were satisfied with the level of information contained in the report and agreed that the report was easy to understand and that the level of explanations given regarding visual function were clear. The main disparities between parents and teaching professionals were concerning the amount of medical terminology used in the report, with only 7% (n = 1) of those from the educational setting, but 30% (n = 6) of parents feeling there was too much. Adaptations were also more likely to have been implemented in the educational setting [82% (n = 11)] as compared with 62% (n = 16) in the home. Eighty-three per cent (n = 43) of respondents reported that low vision aids were used at either home or school on at least a weekly basis.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)247-252
    Number of pages6
    JournalOphthalmic and Physiological Optics
    Volume28
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - May 2008

    Keywords

    • Children
    • Education
    • Low vision
    • Low vision aids
    • Paediatric
    • Questionnaire
    • Visual impairment

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Usefulness of post-assessment reports in a paediatric low vision clinic: A questionnaire survey of parents and education professionals'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this