Variation in National Clinical Audit Data Capture: Is Using Routine Data the Answer?

Dawn W Dowding; Natasha Alvarado; Lynn McVey; Mamas Mamas; Rebecca Randell

doi:10.3233/SHTI190583

Variation in National Clinical Audit Data Capture: Is Using Routine Data the Answer?

Dawn W Dowding, Natasha Alvarado, Lynn McVey, Mamas Mamas, Rebecca Randell

University of Leeds

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

42 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

National Clinical Audit (NCA) data are collected from all National Health Service providers in the UK, to measure the quality of care and stimulate quality improvement initatives. As part of a larger study we explored how NHS providers currently collect NCA data and the resources involved. Study results highlight a dependence on manual data entry and use of professional resources, which could be improved by exploring how routine clinical data could be captured more effectively.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1658-1659
Number of pages	2
Journal	Studies in Health Technology and Informatics
Volume	264
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI190583
Publication status	Published - 21 Aug 2019

Keywords

Clinical Audit
Medical Audit
Quality Improvement

Access to Document

10.3233/SHTI190583Licence: CC BY-NC

SHTI-264-SHTI190583Final published version, 126 KBLicence: CC BY-NC

Cite this

@article{5152d4a29e3144f79fea24896d829690,

title = "Variation in National Clinical Audit Data Capture: Is Using Routine Data the Answer?",

abstract = "National Clinical Audit (NCA) data are collected from all National Health Service providers in the UK, to measure the quality of care and stimulate quality improvement initatives. As part of a larger study we explored how NHS providers currently collect NCA data and the resources involved. Study results highlight a dependence on manual data entry and use of professional resources, which could be improved by exploring how routine clinical data could be captured more effectively.",

keywords = "Clinical Audit, Medical Audit, Quality Improvement",

author = "Dowding, {Dawn W} and Natasha Alvarado and Lynn McVey and Mamas Mamas and Rebecca Randell",

year = "2019",

month = aug,

day = "21",

doi = "10.3233/SHTI190583",

language = "English",

volume = "264",

pages = "1658--1659",

journal = "Studies in Health Technology and Informatics",

issn = "0926-9630",

publisher = "IOS Press BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Variation in National Clinical Audit Data Capture

T2 - Is Using Routine Data the Answer?

AU - Dowding, Dawn W

AU - Alvarado, Natasha

AU - McVey, Lynn

AU - Mamas, Mamas

AU - Randell, Rebecca

PY - 2019/8/21

Y1 - 2019/8/21

N2 - National Clinical Audit (NCA) data are collected from all National Health Service providers in the UK, to measure the quality of care and stimulate quality improvement initatives. As part of a larger study we explored how NHS providers currently collect NCA data and the resources involved. Study results highlight a dependence on manual data entry and use of professional resources, which could be improved by exploring how routine clinical data could be captured more effectively.

AB - National Clinical Audit (NCA) data are collected from all National Health Service providers in the UK, to measure the quality of care and stimulate quality improvement initatives. As part of a larger study we explored how NHS providers currently collect NCA data and the resources involved. Study results highlight a dependence on manual data entry and use of professional resources, which could be improved by exploring how routine clinical data could be captured more effectively.

KW - Clinical Audit

KW - Medical Audit

KW - Quality Improvement

U2 - 10.3233/SHTI190583

DO - 10.3233/SHTI190583

M3 - Article

C2 - 31438279

SN - 0926-9630

VL - 264

SP - 1658

EP - 1659

JO - Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

JF - Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

ER -

Variation in National Clinical Audit Data Capture: Is Using Routine Data the Answer?

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this