Vitamin D Deficiency Is Not Associated with Diabetic Retinopathy or Maculopathy

Uazman Alam, Yasar Amjad, Anges Wan Shan Chan, Omar Asghar, Ioannis Petropoulos, Rayaz Malik

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Experimental and clinical studies suggest a possible association between vitamin D deficiency and both diabetic retinopathy and maculopathy.

METHODS: We have performed a cross-sectional study in adults with types 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus. The relationship between the presence and severity of diabetic retinopathy and maculopathy with serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration was evaluated using logistic regression analyses in the presence of demographic and clinical covariates.

RESULTS: 657 adults with diabetes were stratified based on retinopathy grading: No Diabetic Retinopathy (39%), Background Diabetic Retinopathy (37%), Preproliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (21%), and Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (3%), respectively. There were no differences in serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations (25(OH)D) between the groups (15.3 ± 9.0 versus 16.4 ± 10.5 versus 15.9 ± 10.4 versus 15.7 ± 8.5 ng/mL, P = NS). Logistic regression analysis demonstrated no statistically significant relationship between the severity of retinopathy and serum 25(OH)D. Furthermore, there was no difference in serum 25(OH)D between those with (n = 94, 14%) and those without (n = 563, 86%) Diabetic Maculopathy (16.2 ± 10.0 versus 15.8 ± 9.8, P = NS) and no relationship was demonstrated by logistic regression analyses between the two variables.

CONCLUSIONS: This study has found no association between serum 25(OH)D and the presence and severity of diabetic retinopathy or maculopathy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)6156217
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Diabetes Research
Volume2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Keywords

  • Journal Article

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Vitamin D Deficiency Is Not Associated with Diabetic Retinopathy or Maculopathy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this