Wakefield models for particle tracking codes

A Latina; Rumolo G; D Schulte; Blair G; Malton S; Smith J D A; Roger Barlow; A Bungau

doi:10.1109/PAC.2007.4440431

Wakefield models for particle tracking codes

A Latina
, Rumolo G
, D Schulte
, Blair G
, Malton S
, Smith J D A
, Roger Barlow
, A Bungau

Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution

Abstract

Wakefields have a considerable effect on beam dynamics and they must not be neglected for emittance growth studies, background estimates and other problems. The codes used for these problems are normally not capable of self-consistent wakefield calculations. They should thus be extended with either analytical models or export the wakefields numerically evaluated with other codes (such as GdfidL) when analytical models are not feasible. Both approaches are presented as well as their implementation in PLACET, MERLIN and BDSIM. The simulation results for the ILC and CLIC beam delivery systems are given as an example. Results produced with different codes are compared.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	host publication
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1109/PAC.2007.4440431
Publication status	Published - Jun 2008
Event	Prepared for Particle Accelerator Conference (PAC 07), Albuquerque, New Mexico, 25-29 Jun 2007 - Duration: 1 Jan 1824 → …

Conference

Conference	Prepared for Particle Accelerator Conference (PAC 07), Albuquerque, New Mexico, 25-29 Jun 2007
Period	1/01/24 → …

Access to Document

10.1109/PAC.2007.4440431

Cite this

@inproceedings{786db6c6783d4c25aedaa167658599fb,

title = "Wakefield models for particle tracking codes",

abstract = "Wakefields have a considerable effect on beam dynamics and they must not be neglected for emittance growth studies, background estimates and other problems. The codes used for these problems are normally not capable of self-consistent wakefield calculations. They should thus be extended with either analytical models or export the wakefields numerically evaluated with other codes (such as GdfidL) when analytical models are not feasible. Both approaches are presented as well as their implementation in PLACET, MERLIN and BDSIM. The simulation results for the ILC and CLIC beam delivery systems are given as an example. Results produced with different codes are compared.",

author = "A Latina and Rumolo G and D Schulte and Blair G and Malton S and \{J D A\}, Smith and Roger Barlow and A Bungau",

year = "2008",

month = jun,

doi = "10.1109/PAC.2007.4440431",

language = "English",

booktitle = "host publication",

note = "Prepared for Particle Accelerator Conference (PAC 07), Albuquerque, New Mexico, 25-29 Jun 2007 ; Conference date: 01-01-1824",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Wakefield models for particle tracking codes

AU - Latina, A

AU - G, Rumolo

AU - Schulte, D

AU - G, Blair

AU - S, Malton

AU - J D A, Smith

AU - Barlow, Roger

AU - Bungau, A

PY - 2008/6

Y1 - 2008/6

N2 - Wakefields have a considerable effect on beam dynamics and they must not be neglected for emittance growth studies, background estimates and other problems. The codes used for these problems are normally not capable of self-consistent wakefield calculations. They should thus be extended with either analytical models or export the wakefields numerically evaluated with other codes (such as GdfidL) when analytical models are not feasible. Both approaches are presented as well as their implementation in PLACET, MERLIN and BDSIM. The simulation results for the ILC and CLIC beam delivery systems are given as an example. Results produced with different codes are compared.

AB - Wakefields have a considerable effect on beam dynamics and they must not be neglected for emittance growth studies, background estimates and other problems. The codes used for these problems are normally not capable of self-consistent wakefield calculations. They should thus be extended with either analytical models or export the wakefields numerically evaluated with other codes (such as GdfidL) when analytical models are not feasible. Both approaches are presented as well as their implementation in PLACET, MERLIN and BDSIM. The simulation results for the ILC and CLIC beam delivery systems are given as an example. Results produced with different codes are compared.

U2 - 10.1109/PAC.2007.4440431

DO - 10.1109/PAC.2007.4440431

M3 - Conference contribution

BT - host publication

T2 - Prepared for Particle Accelerator Conference (PAC 07), Albuquerque, New Mexico, 25-29 Jun 2007

Y2 - 1 January 1824

ER -

Wakefield models for particle tracking codes

Abstract

Conference

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this