TY - JOUR
T1 - Wall-modeled large eddy simulation of 90° bent pipe flows with/without particles
T2 - A comparative study
AU - Fazeli, Maryam
AU - Emdad, Homayoun
AU - Mehdi Alishahi, Mohammad
AU - Rezaeiravesh, Saleh
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2024/2/1
Y1 - 2024/2/1
N2 - Wall-modeled large eddy simulation (WMLES) has been proven to be a cost-effective approach capable of resolving turbulence up to certain resolutions. Among the simplest wall models used are the equilibrium wall models, assuming the pressure gradient and convective terms balance out in the momentum equations. There is a lack of studies to assess the performance of these standard wall models in internal turbulent flows including separation regions with/without particles. Regarding this research gap, we have conducted WMLES of incompressible turbulent flows, to the authors’ knowledge, for the first time, in 90° bent pipes with and without particles using an algebraic equilibrium wall model (Spalding's function). A pipe flow simulation was conducted to confirm the simulation setup and assess the sensitivity with respect to the modeling parameters. In each case, comparisons are made with experiment or direct numerical simulation (DNS), and depending on the case, with other existing simulation methods in the literature: WMLES, standard (wall-resolving) LES, and Reynolds stress model (RSM) for Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) simulations. Despite the controversy on the performance of equilibrium wall models in nonequilibrium flows, our results show acceptable accuracy of this type of wall models. Specifically in the bent pipe flow with particles, WMLES succeeded in predicting particle deposition efficiency at Stokes numbers greater than 0.5, but obtained less accurate results for smaller Stokes numbers. The WMLES errors were, however, on par with those of the standard LES employed with a tenfold higher grid cell count. Improved results would be expected if combined with auxiliary mechanisms such as stochastic models.
AB - Wall-modeled large eddy simulation (WMLES) has been proven to be a cost-effective approach capable of resolving turbulence up to certain resolutions. Among the simplest wall models used are the equilibrium wall models, assuming the pressure gradient and convective terms balance out in the momentum equations. There is a lack of studies to assess the performance of these standard wall models in internal turbulent flows including separation regions with/without particles. Regarding this research gap, we have conducted WMLES of incompressible turbulent flows, to the authors’ knowledge, for the first time, in 90° bent pipes with and without particles using an algebraic equilibrium wall model (Spalding's function). A pipe flow simulation was conducted to confirm the simulation setup and assess the sensitivity with respect to the modeling parameters. In each case, comparisons are made with experiment or direct numerical simulation (DNS), and depending on the case, with other existing simulation methods in the literature: WMLES, standard (wall-resolving) LES, and Reynolds stress model (RSM) for Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) simulations. Despite the controversy on the performance of equilibrium wall models in nonequilibrium flows, our results show acceptable accuracy of this type of wall models. Specifically in the bent pipe flow with particles, WMLES succeeded in predicting particle deposition efficiency at Stokes numbers greater than 0.5, but obtained less accurate results for smaller Stokes numbers. The WMLES errors were, however, on par with those of the standard LES employed with a tenfold higher grid cell count. Improved results would be expected if combined with auxiliary mechanisms such as stochastic models.
KW - 90° bent pipe
KW - Equilibrium wall model
KW - Particle simulation
KW - Turbulent flow
KW - Wall-modeled large eddy simulation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85180571316&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/cdc3890a-5878-3c20-93ab-116454f93315/
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2023.109268
DO - 10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2023.109268
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85180571316
SN - 0142-727X
VL - 105
JO - International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow
JF - International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow
M1 - 109268
ER -