Abstract
© 2014 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands.Since the 2011 revolution claimants in Libya have been lobbying to demand reinstatement of property confiscated from their families by Qadhafi under Law 4/1978. During this campaign they have forcefully argued that they have been impoverished and sidelined as victims of corruption. In particular, they highlight how their property enriched and empowered the Qadhafi regime's corrupt elites as it was redistributed as a form of state controlled 'rent'. However, in making this argument they have tried to limit retrospective evaluations of property rights to the Qadhafi period, preventing investigation of their own families' accumulation of property under the Italian occupation or the monarchy. Property claimants' preferred solution is for the democratically elected government to enforce property restitution and to allocate state funds for compensation and for housing construction. The prospects for this are not good. In post- revolutionary Libya powerful militia have made land and property grabs, and other post-revolutionary elites are accused of engaging in corruption, in a continuing threat to property claimants' future political and economic status.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 93-122 |
| Number of pages | 29 |
| Journal | Middle East Law and Governance |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 30 Jul 2014 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- civil society
- corruption
- Libya
- property disputes
- rent seeking
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '"we woke up and everything had gone to Qadhafi": Corruption, rent-seeking, and struggle for elite status during Libyan property disputes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver