TY - JOUR
T1 - Weekly variation in health-care quality by day and time of admission: a nationwide, registry-based, prospective cohort study of acute stroke care
AU - Bray, Benjamin D.
AU - . Cloud, Geoffrey C
AU - James, Martin A
AU - Hemingway, Harry
AU - Paley, Lizz
AU - Stewart, Kevin
AU - Tyrrell, Philippa
AU - Wolfe, Charles D A
AU - Rudd, Anthony G
PY - 2016/7/9
Y1 - 2016/7/9
N2 - Summary
Background Studies in many health systems have shown evidence of poorer quality health care for patients admitted
on weekends or overnight than for those admitted during the week (the so-called weekend eff ect). We postulated that
variation in quality was dependent on not only day, but also time, of admission, and aimed to describe the pattern and
magnitude of variation in the quality of acute stroke care across the entire week.
Methods We did this nationwide, registry-based, prospective cohort study using data from the Sentinel Stroke National
Audit Programme. We included all adult patients (aged >16 years) admitted to hospital with acute stroke (ischaemic
or primary intracerebral haemorrhage) in England and Wales between April 1, 2013, and March 31, 2014. Our outcome
measure was 30 day post-admission survival. We estimated adjusted odds ratios for 13 indicators of acute stroke-care
quality by fi tting multilevel multivariable regression models across 42 4-h time periods per week.
Findings The study cohort comprised 74 307 patients with acute stroke admitted to 199 hospitals. Care quality varied
across the entire week, not only between weekends and weekdays, with diff erent quality measures showing diff erent
patterns and magnitudes of temporal variation. We identifi ed four patterns of variation: a diurnal pattern (thrombolysis,
brain scan within 12 h, brain scan within 1 h, dysphagia screening), a day of the week pattern (stroke physician
assessment, nurse assessment, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, and assessment of communication and
swallowing by a speech and language therapist), an off -hours pattern (door-to-needle time for thrombolysis), and a fl ow
pattern whereby quality changed sequentially across days (stroke-unit admission within 4 h). The largest magnitude of
variation was for door-to-needle time within 60 min (range in quality 35–66% [16/46–232/350]; coeffi cient of
variation 18·2). There was no diff erence in 30 day survival between weekends and weekdays (adjusted odds ratio 1·03,
95% CI 0·95–1·13), but patients admitted overnight on weekdays had lower odds of survival (0·90, 0·82–0·99).
Interpretation The weekend eff ect is a simplifi cation, and just one of several patterns of weekly variation occurring in
the quality of stroke care. Weekly variation should be further investigated in other health-care settings, and quality
improvement should focus on reducing temporal variation in quality and not only the weekend eff ect.
AB - Summary
Background Studies in many health systems have shown evidence of poorer quality health care for patients admitted
on weekends or overnight than for those admitted during the week (the so-called weekend eff ect). We postulated that
variation in quality was dependent on not only day, but also time, of admission, and aimed to describe the pattern and
magnitude of variation in the quality of acute stroke care across the entire week.
Methods We did this nationwide, registry-based, prospective cohort study using data from the Sentinel Stroke National
Audit Programme. We included all adult patients (aged >16 years) admitted to hospital with acute stroke (ischaemic
or primary intracerebral haemorrhage) in England and Wales between April 1, 2013, and March 31, 2014. Our outcome
measure was 30 day post-admission survival. We estimated adjusted odds ratios for 13 indicators of acute stroke-care
quality by fi tting multilevel multivariable regression models across 42 4-h time periods per week.
Findings The study cohort comprised 74 307 patients with acute stroke admitted to 199 hospitals. Care quality varied
across the entire week, not only between weekends and weekdays, with diff erent quality measures showing diff erent
patterns and magnitudes of temporal variation. We identifi ed four patterns of variation: a diurnal pattern (thrombolysis,
brain scan within 12 h, brain scan within 1 h, dysphagia screening), a day of the week pattern (stroke physician
assessment, nurse assessment, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, and assessment of communication and
swallowing by a speech and language therapist), an off -hours pattern (door-to-needle time for thrombolysis), and a fl ow
pattern whereby quality changed sequentially across days (stroke-unit admission within 4 h). The largest magnitude of
variation was for door-to-needle time within 60 min (range in quality 35–66% [16/46–232/350]; coeffi cient of
variation 18·2). There was no diff erence in 30 day survival between weekends and weekdays (adjusted odds ratio 1·03,
95% CI 0·95–1·13), but patients admitted overnight on weekdays had lower odds of survival (0·90, 0·82–0·99).
Interpretation The weekend eff ect is a simplifi cation, and just one of several patterns of weekly variation occurring in
the quality of stroke care. Weekly variation should be further investigated in other health-care settings, and quality
improvement should focus on reducing temporal variation in quality and not only the weekend eff ect.
UR - https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/weekly-variation-in-healthcare-quality-by-day-and-time-of-admission(b9a6e41e-acdc-4586-a13c-34784b02bf21).html
U2 - 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30443-3
DO - 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30443-3
M3 - Article
SN - 0140-6736
VL - 388
SP - 170
EP - 177
JO - The Lancet
JF - The Lancet
IS - 10040
ER -