Weekly versus twice weekly bortezomib given in conjunction with rituximab, in patients with recurrent follicular lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma and Waldenström macroglobulinaemia

Agathoclis Agathocleous, Ama Rohatiner, Simon Rule, Hannah Hunter, Jonathan Paul Kerr, Susan M. Neeson, Janet Matthews, Sandra Strauss, Silvia Montoto, Peter Johnson, John Radford, Andrew Lister

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    The combination of bortezomib and rituximab was evaluated in patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), follicular lymphoma (FL) and Waldenström macroglobulinaemia (WM), in a Phase I and later, a randomized Phase II study. In the randomized study, 42 patients with recurrent/refractory disease received either: bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 on days 1, 4, 8 and 11 of a 3-week cycle with rituximab 375 mg/m2 on day 1 (21 patients) or: bortezomib 1.6 mg/m2 and rituximab on days 1, 8, 15 and 22 of a 5-week cycle (with rituximab being given only in cycles 1 and 4). Twenty-eight patients were withdrawn (toxicity 16, progression 7, and 'patient choice' 5). The main toxicities were neurological, gastro-intestinal and haematological. The overall response rate was 28/42(67%) and by histology: MCL 11/19, FL 8/15, and WM 9/10. Ten of 28 responding patients remained progression-free at 1-3.5 years. Toxicity and efficacy were equivalent between the two groups. The combination has significant toxicity but is effective, particularly in patients with WM. © 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)346-353
    Number of pages7
    JournalBritish Journal of Haematology
    Volume151
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Nov 2010

    Keywords

    • B-cell malignancies
    • Bortezomib
    • Rituximab

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Weekly versus twice weekly bortezomib given in conjunction with rituximab, in patients with recurrent follicular lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma and Waldenström macroglobulinaemia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this