What goes in must come out: testing for biases in molecular analysis of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities

T E Anne Cotton, Alex J Dumbrell, Thorunn Helgason

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi are widely distributed microbes that form obligate symbioses with the majority of terrestrial plants, altering nutrient transfers between soils and plants, thereby profoundly affecting plant growth and ecosystem properties. Molecular methods are commonly used in the study of AM fungal communities. However, the biases associated with PCR amplification of these organisms and their ability to be utilized quantitatively has never been fully tested. We used Terminal Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (TRFLP) analysis to characterise artificial community templates containing known quantities of defined AM fungal genotypes. This was compared to a parallel in silico analysis that predicted the results of this experiment in the absence of bias. The data suggest that when used quantitatively the TRFLP protocol tested is a powerful, repeatable method for AM fungal community analysis. However, we suggest some limitations to its use for population-level analyses. We found no evidence of PCR bias, supporting the quantitative use of other PCR-based methods for the study of AM fungi such as next generation amplicon sequencing. This finding greatly improves our confidence in methods that quantitatively examine AM fungal communities, providing a greater understanding of the ecology of these important fungi.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere109234
Pages (from-to)1-7
Number of pages7
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume9
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Oct 2014

Keywords

  • Genes, Fungal
  • Mycorrhizae/genetics
  • Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'What goes in must come out: testing for biases in molecular analysis of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this