What is the difference between the manganese porphyrin and corrole analogues of cytochrome P450's compound I?

Sam P. De Visser, François Ogliaro, Zeev Gross, Sason Shaik

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Density functional calculations on oxo-manganese complexes of corrole (1) and porphyrin (2 and 3) show a fundamental difference. The ground state of 1 is the singlet manganese(v) state, 1A(MnV), in which corrole is a closed shell. In contrast, 2 and 3 have high-spin manganese(IV) states, 3A1u and 3A2u, respectively. This difference and the state ordering for each system are rationalized based on the competition between the intrinsic tendency of manganese to prefer high-spin electronic configurations, vis-à-vis the general tendency to prefer double occupancy in the low-lying orbitals. The outcome of this competition is determined primarily by the identity of the macrocycle, corrole versus porphyrin. Corrole with a small cavity holds the MnO moiety with a high off-plane displacement, and thereby prefers the low-spin state. On the other hand, porphyrin with the wider cavity holds the MnO moiety closer to the plane, and thereby prefers high-spin states. © Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH, 2001.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)4954-4960
    Number of pages6
    JournalChemistry - A European Journal
    Volume7
    Issue number22
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 19 Nov 2001

    Keywords

    • Density functional calculations
    • Metalloenzymes
    • Oxomanganese corrole
    • Oxomanganese porphyrin

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'What is the difference between the manganese porphyrin and corrole analogues of cytochrome P450's compound I?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this