What is wrong and what is right about microfinance?

David Hulme, Thankom Arun

Research output: Contribution to conferenceOther

Abstract

Microfinance as the best way of tackling poverty is under attack. It has been accused of failing to help the poor, of treating its clients badly, of charging high interest rates and of encouraging poor people to take on excessive debt burdens. The authors examine these issues, and find that microfinance institutions (MFIs) can have significant positive impacts, including democratization of banking services, provision of secure savings facilities for poor people, and social benefits, particularly for women. The paper looks at the way forward for microfinance, suggesting some changes that need to be implemented by MFIs, banking authorities and governments.
Original languageEnglish
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 26 Jul 2011

Research Beacons, Institutes and Platforms

  • Global Development Institute

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'What is wrong and what is right about microfinance?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this