Abstract
We summarise and take issue with Adam Cooper’s analysis of the relationship between social scientific research and the formulation of energy policy. Cooper’s case for ‘socio-technical’ energy research contains several empirical and logical flaws. We identify five points of weakness in what is intended to be a constructive critique. Though we share his concern that energy policy is less than ideal when lacking input from wider social science, we take a different view of why the problem Cooper identifies exists and, thus, what the appropriate solutions might be.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 10.1016/j.erss.2017.01.023 |
Pages (from-to) | 87-90 |
Number of pages | 4 |
Journal | Energy Research & Social Science |
Volume | 26 |
Issue number | 1 |
Early online date | 8 Feb 2017 |
DOIs |
|
Publication status | Published - Apr 2017 |
Keywords
- : Environmental social science; interdisciplinarity; policy relevance.