Abstract
We summarise and take issue with Adam Cooper’s analysis of the relationship between social scientific research and the formulation of energy policy. Cooper’s case for ‘socio-technical’ energy research contains several empirical and logical flaws. We identify five points of weakness in what is intended to be a constructive critique. Though we share his concern that energy policy is less than ideal when lacking input from wider social science, we take a different view of why the problem Cooper identifies exists and, thus, what the appropriate solutions might be.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 10.1016/j.erss.2017.01.023 |
| Pages (from-to) | 87-90 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Energy Research & Social Science |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Early online date | 8 Feb 2017 |
| DOIs |
|
| Publication status | Published - Apr 2017 |
Keywords
- : Environmental social science; interdisciplinarity; policy relevance.
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '‘What kind of socio-technical research for what sort of influence on energy policy?’'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver