TY - JOUR
T1 - What needs to happen for school autonomy to be mobilised to create more equitable public schools and systems of education?
AU - Keddie, Amanda
AU - MacDonald, Katrina
AU - Blackmore, Jill
AU - Boyask, Ruth
AU - Fitzgerald, Scott
AU - Gavin, Mihajla
AU - Heffernan, Amanda
AU - Hursh, David
AU - McGrath-Champ, Susan
AU - Møller, Jorunn
AU - O’Neill, John
AU - Parding, Karolina
AU - Salokangas, Maija
AU - Skerritt, Craig
AU - Stacey, Meghan
AU - Thomson, Pat
AU - Wilkins, Andrew
AU - Wilson, Rachel
AU - Wylie, Cathy
AU - Yoon, Ee-Seul
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s).
PY - 2022/9/30
Y1 - 2022/9/30
N2 - The series of responses in this article were gathered as part of an online mini conference held in September 2021 that sought to explore different ideas and articulations of school autonomy reform across the world (Australia, Canada, England, Ireland, the USA, Norway, Sweden and New Zealand). It centred upon an important question: what needs to happen for school autonomy to be mobilised to create more equitable public schools and systems of education? There was consensus across the group that school autonomy reform creates further inequities at school and system levels when driven by the logics of marketisation, competition, economic efficiency and public accountability. Against the backdrop of these themes, the conference generated discussion and debate where provocations and points of agreement and disagreement about issues of social justice and the mobilisation of school autonomy reform were raised. As an important output of this discussion, we asked participants to write a short response to the guiding conference question. The following are these responses which range from philosophical considerations, systems and governance perspectives, national particularities and teacher and principal perspectives.
AB - The series of responses in this article were gathered as part of an online mini conference held in September 2021 that sought to explore different ideas and articulations of school autonomy reform across the world (Australia, Canada, England, Ireland, the USA, Norway, Sweden and New Zealand). It centred upon an important question: what needs to happen for school autonomy to be mobilised to create more equitable public schools and systems of education? There was consensus across the group that school autonomy reform creates further inequities at school and system levels when driven by the logics of marketisation, competition, economic efficiency and public accountability. Against the backdrop of these themes, the conference generated discussion and debate where provocations and points of agreement and disagreement about issues of social justice and the mobilisation of school autonomy reform were raised. As an important output of this discussion, we asked participants to write a short response to the guiding conference question. The following are these responses which range from philosophical considerations, systems and governance perspectives, national particularities and teacher and principal perspectives.
KW - Principal autonomy
KW - Public schooling
KW - School autonomy reform
KW - Social justice
KW - Teacher autonomy
U2 - 10.1007/s13384-022-00573-w
DO - 10.1007/s13384-022-00573-w
M3 - Article
C2 - 36212916
SN - 0311-6999
SP - 1
EP - 27
JO - The Australian Educational Researcher
JF - The Australian Educational Researcher
ER -