Projects per year
Abstract
Are women less corrupt than men? Research reinforced this long-held popular assumption, proposing more women in government to reduce corruption. Recently, scholars challenged this assumption. Analysing the 2009 UK parliamentary expenses scandal, we show, using a gendered institutionalist approach, women office-holders’ propensity for corruption is context dependent. Male and female office-holders engage in similarly corrupt behavior when accountability is low. But subsequently they respond to and are treated differently for perceived ‘wrong-doing’ when accountability is high. By comparing low and high accountability contexts using in-depth case-study research, we show how the relationship between corruption, accountability and risk aversion is gendered.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | jxz045 |
Journal | Social Politics |
Volume | 0 |
Early online date | 14 Nov 2019 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 14 Nov 2019 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'When are Women as Corrupt as Men? Gender, Corruption and Accountability in the UK parliamentary expenses scandal'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Projects
- 1 Finished
-
Understanding Institutional Change - a Gender Perspective (UIC)
Waylen, G. (PI), Gains, F. (CoI), Armitage, F. (Researcher), Armitage, F. (Researcher), Jenkins, L. (Researcher), Johnson, R. (Researcher), Mcleod, L. (Researcher), Sepulveda, C. (Researcher), Chappell, L. (Researcher), Lowndes, V. (Researcher) & Mackay, F. (Researcher)
1/06/12 → 31/05/17
Project: Research