Projects per year
Abstract
Are women less corrupt than men? Research reinforced this long-held popular assumption, proposing more women in government to reduce corruption. Recently, scholars challenged this assumption. Analysing the 2009 UK parliamentary expenses scandal, we show, using a gendered institutionalist approach, women office-holders’ propensity for corruption is context dependent. Male and female office-holders engage in similarly corrupt behavior when accountability is low. But subsequently they respond to and are treated differently for perceived ‘wrong-doing’ when accountability is high. By comparing low and high accountability contexts using in-depth case-study research, we show how the relationship between corruption, accountability and risk aversion is gendered.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | jxz045 |
Journal | Social Politics |
Volume | 0 |
Early online date | 14 Nov 2019 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 14 Nov 2019 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'When are Women as Corrupt as Men? Gender, Corruption and Accountability in the UK parliamentary expenses scandal'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Projects
- 1 Finished
-
Understanding Institutional Change - a Gender Perspective (UIC)
Waylen, G., Gains, F., Armitage, F., Armitage, F., Jenkins, L., Johnson, R., Mcleod, L., Sepulveda, C., Chappell, L., Lowndes, V. & Mackay, F.
1/06/12 → 31/05/17
Project: Research