When the harlem renaissance became vogue: Periodization and the organization of postwar American historiography

In the years around mid-century a number of periodizing terms entered Western historiography. These included the Weimar Republic and Frühneuzeit in Germany, the age of Wilberforce in Britain, and the age of Jackson in the United States, to name just a few. The appearance of these terms attested to the popularity that periodization, or the deliberate creation of historical periods, had within historical practice, and they were embraced variously as heuristics, as means of organizing the historical record, and as the root of synthesis. In this essay I trace the coinage of one term, Harlem Renaissance, from its emergence in the 1940s, through to the sharper profile it earned in the postwar years, and its institutionalization in the late twentieth century. In doing so I argue that Harlem Renaissance was neither a term nor a concept used by those who lived during the years it is now said to describe, and illuminate the alternative ways in which contemporaries apprehended their historical position. The context for the coinage and popularization of this term was the displacement of these earlier modes of interpretation by temporal ones, and the emergence of a mode of historical practice that stressed synthetic interpretation. By tracing the fluctuating ways in which a core analytical concept like periodization was handled between the mid-and the late twentieth century we might better grasp how historiographical orientations changed in these years. © 2014 Cambridge University Press.