When words speak louder than actions: Delusion, belief, and the power of assertion

David Rose, Wesley Buckwalter, John Turri

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

129 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

People suffering from severe monothematic delusions, such as Capgras, Fregoli, or Cotard patients, regularly assert extraordinary and unlikely things. For example, some say that their loved ones have been replaced by impostors. A popular view in philosophy and cognitive science is that such monothematic delusions aren't beliefs because they don't guide behaviour and affect in the way that beliefs do. Or, if they are beliefs, they are somehow anomalous, atypical, or marginal beliefs. We present evidence from five studies that folk psychology unambiguously views monothematic delusions as stereotypical beliefs. This calls into question widespread assumptions in the professional literature about belief's stereotypical functional profile. We also show that folk psychology views delusional patients as holding contradictory beliefs. And we show that frequent assertion is a powerful cue to belief ascription, more powerful than even a robust and consistent track record of non-verbal behaviour.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)683-700
Number of pages18
JournalAustralasian Journal of Philosophy
Volume92
Issue number4
Early online date24 Apr 2014
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 24 Apr 2014

Keywords

  • Delusion
  • belief
  • folk psychology
  • assertion

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'When words speak louder than actions: Delusion, belief, and the power of assertion'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this