Where do we stand on maximal entropy?

Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

Edwin Jaynes’ principle of maximum entropy holds that one should use the probability distribution with maximum entropy, from all those that fit the evidence, to draw inferences, because that is the distribution that is maximally non-committal with respect to propositions that are underdetermined by the evidence. The principle was widely applied in the years following its introduction in 1957, and in 1978 Jaynes took stock, writing the paper ‘Where do we stand on maximum entropy?’ to present his view of the state of the art. Jaynes’ principle needs to be generalised to a principle of maximal entropy if it is to be applied to first-order inductive logic, where there may be no unique maximum entropy function. The development of this objective Bayesian inductive logic has also been very fertile and it is the task of this chapter to take stock. The chapter provides an introduction to the logic and its motivation, explaining how it overcomes some problems with Carnap’s approach to inductive logic and with the subjective Bayesian approach. It also describes a range of recent results that shed light on features of the logic, its robustness and its decidability, as well as methods for performing inference in the logic.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationPerspectives on logics for data-driven reasoning
EditorsHykel Hosni, Jürgen Landes
Place of PublicationCham
PublisherSpringer Netherland
Chapter3
Pages39-61
Number of pages23
ISBN (Print)978-3-031-77894-0
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024

Publication series

NameLogic, Argumentation & Reasoning

Keywords

  • Data-centered science
  • Statistical inference
  • Reasoning with evidence
  • Reasoning with correlation
  • Logic and data
  • Data-driven reasoning
  • Causal reasoning
  • Logics for statistical inference
  • Evidence and logic

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Where do we stand on maximal entropy?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this