Which moss is which? Identification of the threatened moss Orthodontium gracile using molecular and morphological techniques

J. K. Rowntree, R. S. Cowan, M. Leggett, M. M. Ramsay, M. F. Fay

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Taxonomic misidentification has potentially serious consequences for the management of threatened species. Closely related moss species are often difficult to distinguish from each other using morphological characteristics. Here we compared the use of molecular (DNA barcoding of the trnL-F intron, AFLPs) and morphological techniques to demonstrate that ex situ cultures, held for re-introduction trails, of the UK critically endangered moss Orthodontium gracile were contaminated with the potentially invasive species O. lineare. Barcoding techniques and AFLPs were both successful in determining Orthodontium species identity. There was some discrepancy between determinations from molecular and morphological techniques and some individuals were misidentified using morphological characteristics alone. When species identity is critical, for example prior to re-establishment or re-introduction programmes, we recommend that identity of mosses and other bryophytes be established by molecular techniques, in particular barcoding of the trnL-F intron. © 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1033-1042
    Number of pages9
    JournalConservation Genetics
    Volume11
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jun 2010

    Keywords

    • AFLP
    • Barcoding
    • Ex situ conservation
    • Stereid cells
    • Threatened bryophytes
    • trnL-F intron

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Which moss is which? Identification of the threatened moss Orthodontium gracile using molecular and morphological techniques'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this