Who guards the guardians? Ian Kennedy, bioethics and the 'ideology of accountability' in British medicine

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    This article charts the history of bioethics in Britain through the work of the academic lawyer Ian Kennedy. From the late 1970s, Kennedy claimed that external oversight, which he termed 'bioethics', was needed to make medicine accountable to patients and the public. I believe these arguments provide a window onto the historical factors that generated the demand for bioethics, and help us determine why it became influential in recent decades. I detail how Kennedy's argument resonated with the Conservative enthusiasm for audit and consumer choice in the 1980s. Contrary to traditional portrayals of bioethics as a critique of medicine, I also show that Kennedy promised it would benefit doctors by improving decision making and maintaining public confidence. This analysis reframes bioethics as an important constituent of the 'audit society': fulfilling the neo-liberal demand for oversight and the medical demand for legitimacy. © 2011 The Author Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for the Social History of Medicine. All rights reserved.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)193-211
    Number of pages18
    JournalSocial History of Medicine
    Volume25
    Issue number1
    Publication statusPublished - Feb 2012

    Keywords

    • accountability
    • audit
    • bioethics
    • neo-liberalism

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Who guards the guardians? Ian Kennedy, bioethics and the 'ideology of accountability' in British medicine'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this