Whose campus, whose security? Students’ views on and experiences of security services and police on university campuses

Remi Joseph-Salisbury; Laura Connelly; Kerry Pimblott; Siobhan O'Neill; Harry Taylor

Whose campus, whose security? Students’ views on and experiences of security services and police on university campuses

Remi Joseph-Salisbury, Laura Connelly, Kerry Pimblott, Siobhan O'Neill, Harry Taylor

Research output: Book/Report › Other report › peer-review

1613 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In recent years, high-profile incidents and student activism have raised questions about how securitisation on university campuses is experienced by students, yet there is a stark absence of academic research on the topic. Whose campus, whose security? draws on three datasets: a national survey of 635 students, regional interviews with 30 students and data obtained through Freedom of Information requests. The study provides the first empirical account of students’ views on, and experiences of, security services and police on UK university campuses. In doing so, it deliberately centres student views and experiences to provide an evidence base for higher education institutions as they operationalise their commitments to the equality, diversity and inclusion agenda.

Original language	English
Publisher	Centre on the Dynamics of Ethnicity (CoDE)
ISBN (Electronic)	ISBN 978-1-3999-7264-2
ISBN (Print)	ISBN 978-1-3999-7264-2
Publication status	Published - 5 Dec 2023

Keywords

student
students
campus
security
securitisation
policing
university
universities

Access to Document

whose campus whose security reportFinal published version, 14.9 MBLicence: CC BY-NC-ND

Cite this

@book{acf942a43ab64c309fa0f8f12a78172b,

title = "Whose campus, whose security? Students{\textquoteright} views on and experiences of security services and police on university campuses",

abstract = "In recent years, high-profile incidents and student activism have raised questions about how securitisation on university campuses is experienced by students, yet there is a stark absence of academic research on the topic. Whose campus, whose security? draws on three datasets: a national survey of 635 students, regional interviews with 30 students and data obtained through Freedom of Information requests. The study provides the first empirical account of students{\textquoteright} views on, and experiences of, security services and police on UK university campuses. In doing so, it deliberately centres student views and experiences to provide an evidence base for higher education institutions as they operationalise their commitments to the equality, diversity and inclusion agenda. ",

keywords = "student, students, campus, security, securitisation, policing, university, universities",

author = "Remi Joseph-Salisbury and Laura Connelly and Kerry Pimblott and Siobhan O'Neill and Harry Taylor",

year = "2023",

month = dec,

day = "5",

language = "English",

isbn = "ISBN 978-1-3999-7264-2",

publisher = "Centre on the Dynamics of Ethnicity (CoDE)",

address = "United Kingdom",

}

TY - BOOK

T1 - Whose campus, whose security? Students’ views on and experiences of security services and police on university campuses

AU - Joseph-Salisbury, Remi

AU - Connelly, Laura

AU - Pimblott, Kerry

AU - O'Neill, Siobhan

AU - Taylor, Harry

PY - 2023/12/5

Y1 - 2023/12/5

N2 - In recent years, high-profile incidents and student activism have raised questions about how securitisation on university campuses is experienced by students, yet there is a stark absence of academic research on the topic. Whose campus, whose security? draws on three datasets: a national survey of 635 students, regional interviews with 30 students and data obtained through Freedom of Information requests. The study provides the first empirical account of students’ views on, and experiences of, security services and police on UK university campuses. In doing so, it deliberately centres student views and experiences to provide an evidence base for higher education institutions as they operationalise their commitments to the equality, diversity and inclusion agenda.

AB - In recent years, high-profile incidents and student activism have raised questions about how securitisation on university campuses is experienced by students, yet there is a stark absence of academic research on the topic. Whose campus, whose security? draws on three datasets: a national survey of 635 students, regional interviews with 30 students and data obtained through Freedom of Information requests. The study provides the first empirical account of students’ views on, and experiences of, security services and police on UK university campuses. In doing so, it deliberately centres student views and experiences to provide an evidence base for higher education institutions as they operationalise their commitments to the equality, diversity and inclusion agenda.

KW - student

KW - students

KW - campus

KW - security

KW - securitisation

KW - policing

KW - university

KW - universities

UR - https://www.ethnicity.ac.uk/discover/briefings/whose-campus/

M3 - Other report

SN - ISBN 978-1-3999-7264-2

BT - Whose campus, whose security? Students’ views on and experiences of security services and police on university campuses

PB - Centre on the Dynamics of Ethnicity (CoDE)

ER -

Whose campus, whose security? Students’ views on and experiences of security services and police on university campuses

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

CoDE: Centre on Dynamics of Ethnicity (CoDE)

Cite this

Whose campus, whose security? Students’ views on and experiences of security services and police on university campuses

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Projects

CoDE: Centre on Dynamics of Ethnicity (CoDE)

Cite this