Why Is It So Challenging to Measure Residual Stresses ?

Philip Withers, G S Schajer, M.B. Prime

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

258 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background
Residual stresses have a “hidden” character because they exist in a material without the presence of any external loads. They cannot easily be added or subtracted in a quantified manner, as is done when measuring applied stresses, and so are much more challenging to measure.

Objective
The objective here is to identify and describe the various features that make residual stress measurement methods challenging and to consider the ways that these challenges can be addressed in practice.

Methods
Various of the most common residual stress measurements methods are considered and the challenges associated with them are identified and classified.

Results
Five major challenges for residual stress measurements, and the approaches used for their resolution, are identified.

Conclusions
Despite the various challenges that need to be overcome, residual stress measurements can be successfully undertaken in practice. The most significant feature for success is a highly skilled and knowledge practitioner.
Original languageEnglish
JournalExperimental Mechanics
Early online date12 Aug 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 12 Aug 2022

Keywords

  • Residual stress
  • Measurement

Research Beacons, Institutes and Platforms

  • Henry Royce Institute

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Why Is It So Challenging to Measure Residual Stresses ?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this