Why linked data is not enough for scientists

Sean Bechhofer; Iain Buchan; David De Roure; Paolo Missier; John Ainsworth; Jiten Bhagat; Philip Couch; Don Cruickshank; Mark Delderfield; Ian Dunlop; Matthew Gamble; Danius Michaelides; Stuart Owen; David Newman; Shoaib Sufi; Carole Goble

doi:10.1016/j.future.2011.08.004

Why linked data is not enough for scientists

Sean Bechhofer
, Iain Buchan
, David De Roure
, Paolo Missier
, John Ainsworth
, Jiten Bhagat
, Philip Couch
, Don Cruickshank
, Mark Delderfield
, Ian Dunlop
, Matthew Gamble
, Danius Michaelides
, Stuart Owen
, David Newman
, Shoaib Sufi
, Carole Goble

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

343 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Scientific data represents a significant portion of the linked open data cloud and scientists stand to benefit from the data fusion capability this will afford. Publishing linked data into the cloud, however, does not ensure the required reusability. Publishing has requirements of provenance, quality, credit, attribution and methods to provide the reproducibility that enables validation of results. In this paper we make the case for a scientific data publication model on top of linked data and introduce the notion of Research Objects as first class citizens for sharing and publishing. © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	599-611
Number of pages	12
Journal	Future Generation Computer Systems
Volume	29
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2011.08.004
Publication status	Published - Feb 2013

Keywords

Linked data
Publishing
Reproducibility
Research object
Reuse
Sharing

Access to Document

10.1016/j.future.2011.08.004

POST-PEER-REVIEW-NON-PUBLISHERS.PDFAccepted author manuscript, 471 KB

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167739X11001439

Preparing MethodBox for National Service.
Buchan, I. (PI), Goble, C. (CoI) & Higgins, V. (CoI)
1/03/12 → 31/07/12
Project: Research

Research Object Community Update
Goble, C., Soiland-Reyes, S. & Bechhofer, S., 29 Oct 2018. 4 p.
Research output: Contribution to conference › Abstract › peer-review

Open Access
Why linked data is not enough for scientists
Bechhofer, S., Ainsworth, J., Bhagat, J., Buchan, I., Couch, P., Cruickshank, D., De Roure, D., Delderfield, M., Dunlop, I., Gamble, M., Goble, C., Michaelides, D., Missier, P., Owen, S., Newman, D. & Sufi, S., 2010, Proceedings - 2010 6th IEEE International Conference on e-Science, eScience 2010|Proc. - IEEE Int. Conf. e-Sci., eScience. IEEE Computer Society , p. 300-307 7 p. (Proceedings - 2010 6th IEEE International Conference on e-Science, eScience 2010).
Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › peer-review

Open Access
File
221 Downloads (Pure)

Workshop on Research Objects
Goble, C. (Chair), Palma, R. (Chair), Soiland-Reyes, S. (Chair) & Hof, C. (Chair)
12 Feb 2018 → 29 Oct 2018
Activity: Participating in or organising event(s) › Participating in a conference, workshop, exhibition, performance, inquiry, course etc › Research

Cite this

@article{479e591eb2954478b0c7a145c19dcd45,

title = "Why linked data is not enough for scientists",

abstract = "Scientific data represents a significant portion of the linked open data cloud and scientists stand to benefit from the data fusion capability this will afford. Publishing linked data into the cloud, however, does not ensure the required reusability. Publishing has requirements of provenance, quality, credit, attribution and methods to provide the reproducibility that enables validation of results. In this paper we make the case for a scientific data publication model on top of linked data and introduce the notion of Research Objects as first class citizens for sharing and publishing. {\textcopyright} 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.",

keywords = "Linked data, Publishing, Reproducibility, Research object, Reuse, Sharing",

author = "Sean Bechhofer and Iain Buchan and \{De Roure\}, David and Paolo Missier and John Ainsworth and Jiten Bhagat and Philip Couch and Don Cruickshank and Mark Delderfield and Ian Dunlop and Matthew Gamble and Danius Michaelides and Stuart Owen and David Newman and Shoaib Sufi and Carole Goble",

year = "2013",

month = feb,

doi = "10.1016/j.future.2011.08.004",

language = "English",

volume = "29",

pages = "599--611",

journal = "Future Generation Computer Systems",

publisher = "Elsevier BV",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why linked data is not enough for scientists

AU - Bechhofer, Sean

AU - Buchan, Iain

AU - De Roure, David

AU - Missier, Paolo

AU - Ainsworth, John

AU - Bhagat, Jiten

AU - Couch, Philip

AU - Cruickshank, Don

AU - Delderfield, Mark

AU - Dunlop, Ian

AU - Gamble, Matthew

AU - Michaelides, Danius

AU - Owen, Stuart

AU - Newman, David

AU - Sufi, Shoaib

AU - Goble, Carole

PY - 2013/2

Y1 - 2013/2

N2 - Scientific data represents a significant portion of the linked open data cloud and scientists stand to benefit from the data fusion capability this will afford. Publishing linked data into the cloud, however, does not ensure the required reusability. Publishing has requirements of provenance, quality, credit, attribution and methods to provide the reproducibility that enables validation of results. In this paper we make the case for a scientific data publication model on top of linked data and introduce the notion of Research Objects as first class citizens for sharing and publishing. © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

AB - Scientific data represents a significant portion of the linked open data cloud and scientists stand to benefit from the data fusion capability this will afford. Publishing linked data into the cloud, however, does not ensure the required reusability. Publishing has requirements of provenance, quality, credit, attribution and methods to provide the reproducibility that enables validation of results. In this paper we make the case for a scientific data publication model on top of linked data and introduce the notion of Research Objects as first class citizens for sharing and publishing. © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

KW - Linked data

KW - Publishing

KW - Reproducibility

KW - Research object

KW - Reuse

KW - Sharing

U2 - 10.1016/j.future.2011.08.004

DO - 10.1016/j.future.2011.08.004

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 599

EP - 611

JO - Future Generation Computer Systems

JF - Future Generation Computer Systems

IS - 2

ER -

Why linked data is not enough for scientists

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Projects

Preparing MethodBox for National Service.

Research output

Research Object Community Update

Why linked data is not enough for scientists

Activities

Workshop on Research Objects

Cite this