TY - JOUR
T1 - Why Test study protocol: a UK-wide audit using the Primary Care Academic CollaboraTive (PACT) to explore the reasons for primary care testing
AU - Burrell, Alexander
AU - Duncan, Polly
AU - Bennett-Britton, Ian
AU - Hodgson, Sam
AU - Merriel, Samuel WD
AU - Waqar, Salman
AU - Whiting, Penny
AU - Watson, Jessica
N1 - Funding Information:
The study was supported by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West) and funded by Research Capability Funding from the Bristol, North Somerset and South Gloucestershire Clinical Commissioning Group (RCF20/21-1-1JW & RCF21/22-1JW). The views expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Authors
PY - 2022/9/28
Y1 - 2022/9/28
N2 - Background: The number of blood tests done in primary care has been increasing over the past 20 years. Some estimates suggest that up to one-quarter of these tests may not have been needed. This could lead to a cascade effect of further investigations, appointments, or referrals, as well as anxiety for patients, increased workload, and costs to the health service. To better understand the impact and sequelae of blood tests on patients, it is necessary to know why blood tests are requested and what is done with the results. Aim: To explore who orders blood tests and why, and how test results are actioned in primary care. Design & setting: Retrospective audit of electronic health records in general practices across the UK. Method: The Primary care Academic CollaboraTive (PACT), a UK-wide network of primary care health professionals, will be utilised to collect data from individual practices. PACT members will be asked to review the electronic health records of 50 patients who had recent blood tests in their practice, and manually extract anonymised data on who requested the test, the indication, the result, and subsequent actions. Data will also be collected from PACT members to assess the feasibility of the collaborative model. Conclusion: PACT offers a unique opportunity to extract clinical data which cannot otherwise be obtained. Understanding the indications for tests will help identify priority areas for research to optimise testing and patient safety in primary care.
AB - Background: The number of blood tests done in primary care has been increasing over the past 20 years. Some estimates suggest that up to one-quarter of these tests may not have been needed. This could lead to a cascade effect of further investigations, appointments, or referrals, as well as anxiety for patients, increased workload, and costs to the health service. To better understand the impact and sequelae of blood tests on patients, it is necessary to know why blood tests are requested and what is done with the results. Aim: To explore who orders blood tests and why, and how test results are actioned in primary care. Design & setting: Retrospective audit of electronic health records in general practices across the UK. Method: The Primary care Academic CollaboraTive (PACT), a UK-wide network of primary care health professionals, will be utilised to collect data from individual practices. PACT members will be asked to review the electronic health records of 50 patients who had recent blood tests in their practice, and manually extract anonymised data on who requested the test, the indication, the result, and subsequent actions. Data will also be collected from PACT members to assess the feasibility of the collaborative model. Conclusion: PACT offers a unique opportunity to extract clinical data which cannot otherwise be obtained. Understanding the indications for tests will help identify priority areas for research to optimise testing and patient safety in primary care.
KW - Clinical decision-making
KW - Clinical laboratory techniques
KW - Collaborative research
KW - Electronic health records
KW - Feasibility studies
KW - General practice
KW - Hematologic tests
KW - Primary health care
U2 - 10.3399/BJGPO.2022.0017
DO - 10.3399/BJGPO.2022.0017
M3 - Article
C2 - 35508322
SN - 2398-3795
VL - 6
JO - BJGP Open
JF - BJGP Open
IS - 3
M1 - BJGPO.2022.0017
ER -